Never a tax---Oh I mean user fee that Mitt Romney doesn't like. While Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney the self proclaimed Conservative, supported 126 brand new user fee increases from increases in fees for marriage licenses, gun registrations, blindness certificates, Oh my !

While chasing votes, Romney claims that he knows how "business works" with tax cuts but does 'Never a User Fee that I didn't support Mitt' really believe what he says or is he just another Big Tax & Spend Liberal pandering to gullible voters?

Mitt supported increases in User Fee's on home deed registrations, increases in taxes on gasoline, corporate trusts, non-profit corporations, sales catalogs, you name it and Mitt will tax it.

Tax & Spend Liberal Mitt, became the Governor of Massachusetts campaigning on a no new tax pledge as he does today but seen the state budget balloon from $22.7 Billion Dollars to $27.9 Billion dollars ($2.2 Billion Dollars of those spending increases the State Legislature took off budget) likewise this year the State of Massachusetts is expected to exceed the budget for Health Care, thanks to Mitt's Health Care Initiative.

When the legislation mandating that all citizens of Massachusetts have Health Insurance was signed into law by Mitt Romney, the state estimated the uninsured to be 400,000 it was only off by a mere 250,000 This year, the State of Massachusetts is expected to exceed the budget for Health Care by approximately $245 Million Dollars and next year the estimate is $400 Million Dollars. "Boston Globe.com January 24, 2008

Mitt Romney is promising to do for America what he did to the good people of Massachusetts---we can't afford another Big Tax & Spend Liberal like Mitt.

While Mitt may Insist that he is the True Conservative "Knox News.com February 5, 2008  "...telling voters we don't want Senator McCain...we want a Conservative..."  There appears to be some confusion on Mitt's part what a true Conservative is?

Mitt doesn't even know what his real position is on Abortion---one day he supports 'Safe and Legal Abortions' another day he changes his mind. Ms. Stephanie Ebbert, wrote in the Boston Globe.com July 3, 2005 "Advocates on both sides are confused over Governor Romney's position on Abortion and are seeking to understand the meaning of recent comments he has made, in light of the positions he outlined in his 2002 gubernatorial campaign....When he ran for the U.S. Senate in liberal-leaning Massachusetts in 1994, Romney said Abortion should be "safe and legal." As a candidate for Governor in 2002, he said that he would keep the state's abortion rights laws intact...but this year as he began preparing for a potential run for President, Romney said he is "in a different place" than he was when he first ran for office in 1994 and has stressed that he is personally pro-life."

Which is it? Is Mitt Pro-Life or Pro-Choice---or does it just depend on who this Tax & Spend Liberal is pandering to at any given moment?

Can genuine Conservatives really trust Mitt to be President?